Indonesia transparency in Criminal Justice System

Travel Blog Site

Join Travel Blog Site $100,00 USD Entrepreneur Site $250,00 USD Business Site and Make Money Online $500,00 USD

Registered Business Domain Now

American Forum USINDO Indonesia transparency in Criminal Justice System have providing a talk on speaker sources from Michael Kagay District Attorney  for third Judicial District of the State of Kansas, Brian MacHarg Director of Civic Engagement Appalanchian State University and Choky Ramadhan an Executive Director, Indonesia Judiciary Monitoring Society (MaPPI FH UI).

Current practice of  Administration Court in Jakarta proceeding require a minimum of Rp 500,000 to be deposited to challenge police judgement for  traffic court and for procedure of  property felony is by request of accessible investigation of police to mandatorily pay for Rp 2 million  to be deposited without guaranteed for report of police investigation or  "BAP" (Berita Acara Polisi ) to individual defendant and  return on deposit fee when the access of that current information and requisition to available for hearing and trial court .  Indonesia government need to reform for example through civic organization for example MaPPI. Criminal transparency and relation of civic service organization  need to take a public forum to understand the situation for good of all citizen  and  procedural court and pre-court proceeding  help the citizen  of ease and cost less court proceeding and trust the police judgement 

Transparency in Criminal Justice system: whether System Reform and Civic Engagement of today forum open the idea to press publicity and transparency of police organization. More  Institute Criminal Justice Reform has worked on published articles of ICU 3/2017: Indonesia's Legal Framework on Defamation Law
According to Institute Criminal Justice Reform

1, Criminal Defamation in the Draft Criminal Code (R KUHP): elements of Criminal Defamation should be more precise, justifications must be expanded and criminal sanctions should be lighter instead of Escalation of Criminal Sanction for Criminal Defamation Acts in the Rencangan KUHP (Pre Planned KUHP) from Oral, Written, Slander, Minor Contempt, Slander Complaint, False Suspicion, to Defamation against deceased people.

2. Institute of Criminal Justice also need to reform for Authority of Justice (Police) treat criminal inhuman and any other cruel act that under current government and DPR work to ban act of torture in criminal proceeding investigation (Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment/UNCAT)

For example recently in 2018 Torture and sex harrasement during police investigation of daugther of Inang Naburju sourced  by Advocate Hotman Paris at Kopi Joni Kelapa Gading

Other common for lottery agent in Bengkali was detained recently content informed  www.cakaplah.com  by clicking this content information now. The press release kapolsek does not care on abuse of power of police towards detainees and fair trail in court towards for example  how long the two detainees will be at police arrest at maxim um and what is the resolution and any divert resolution to justice to this misdemeanor case instead of display the act of arrest and  siezed to punishment to the full extent. As the propagate journalist media  cakaplah.com only tell half the story and without consent of the press release publicity for fair trial before court for their privacy information. No more access further information and hearing necessary by cakaplah.com for responsibility to publicity for further what happen to this two detainees.  

This edition of ICLU elaborates the legal framework yon defamation law in Indonesia. The discussion will cover all provisions regarding both criminal defamation and civil defamation currently incorporated in various Indonesian laws.

It is noteworthy that the current situation on freedom of expression in Indonesia becomes more interesting for discussion. In particular, the discussion regarding on 16 August 2017.

We are hoping that this edition of ICLU will help you as the readers to gain proper knowledge regarding defamation law in Indonesia. 

As Indonesia citizen, if you would like to contribute and donate as little as Rp 15000 to Institute of Criminal Justice Reform Click here Now.

As historical wrong perspective  of the criminal law of Indonesia is final and  based fixed historically on the law of Dutch. Indonesia KUPH and its articles are products of house representative of Indonesia  herself but not "Orang Bule or Orang Asing" Indonesia criminal law that have been practiced for mandatory fee compulsion  toward proceeding traffic ticket is product of non-passing reformed of traffic court during current government administration.  Indonesia citizen does not have free access to court administration proceeding  without court fee for fair hearing trial.

As an advocate, Michael Kagay District Court in State of Kansas. Kansas State police district require to use camera bodyware for transparency operation of criminal  and investigation and arrested by policemen .  As the advocate, Advocate Michael prefer instead of full extend of secure public safety, diversion  has been prefer for property  crime  as 9% of crime felony in his district was divert to community service, restitution and etc negotiation after the felony plea guilty. But in Indonesia of case of prior governor Jakarta defamation law, full the punishment by religious activist are on the rise. As Religious civic organization, Indonesia religious activist propagate their agenda to gain moments of anti government rhetoric instead of publicity is very soul of justice. It keep the judge himself while trying  under trial. As the hoax rumor  gain of confusion, anti thesis towards current government that reform the political agenda.

Hailed by Glenn Beck as a “Watchdog,” bestselling author and legal expert Christopher Horner explains how every citizen can use the Freedom of Information Act to find out what our government is up to.  

LIBERALS ARE HIDING THE TRUTH FROM YOU. WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT, AMERICA? 

Hailed by Glenn Beck as a “watchdog” and by Rush Limbaugh as a “go-to guy,” bestselling author and attorney Christopher C. Horner is a leader in the fight against liberal tyranny in America—with his requests for information even declared “criminal” by the Obama administration. Revealing explosive new information obtained through the Freedom of Information Act and well-placed sources, Horner exposes the tightly kept secret of liberals running our government and schools: a carefully managed war to undermine the taxpayers’ right to see what their government is up to. 

WHAT IS THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION HIDING? 

During his campaign, Barack Obama promised “the most transparent administration in history.” Not only has this proven to be an empty promise, but he and his liberal allies systematically hide their activities from the public. They use private email accounts and computers, avoid creating records, stonewall information requests, and otherwise delay or deny access to information every taxpayer has a right to know. This eye-opening book exposes the White House tricks, tactics, and “tradecraft” now regularly used to keep Americans in the dark. You’ll learn: 

* Scandalous examples of activist government employee tricks to hide their activities. 

* How the Obama administration, which leaks sensitive information for political gain (while aggressively prosecuting whistleblowers), deliberately politicized the FOIA process to stonewall legitimate requests for public information. 

* What the Democrats tried to hide about their crony deals with big business, Solyndra, various liberal initiatives, and UN schemes. 

* How American colleges and universities bow to radical liberal faculties to hide public records. 

* How to fight these tactics and make your own FOIA requests to get the information you need—even when the government tries to stop you. 

This is more than an exposé on the latest Washington cover-up. It is a wake-up call and how-to manual for all Americans to demand transparency from our leaders and defeat the liberal attack on open and honest debate. If you believe in America, you need to fight for your freedoms. You need to take a stand against the Liberal War on Transparency.

When he invoked China's mainstream academia to criticize the "weaknesses" of Chinese criminal procedure-such as dossier-based proceedings, powerful prosecutors, and activist judiciary-the author, Shuai Zhang, was told by his supervisors in the Netherlands that this was just how things were done. Later on, he found that adversarial dogmas are common in the Chinese legal community, with the textbooks on criminal procedure playing a role to mislead people. While many exemplary common law countries have deviated from their adversarial traditions to begin to embrace an inquisitorial approach-especially in pre-trial procedure-adversarial dogmas do not speak to each and every country. In a broader sense, the author cautions Chinese liberal intellectuals against their inherent, and perhaps unconscious, sense of superiority over both the officialdom and the populace regarding political and legal issues. This sense of superiority blinds them to what really contributes to the well-being of the country and the people, and drive various "window dressing" reforms rather than functional improvements. Dissertation. (Series: Willem Pompe Institute, Vol. 87) [Subject: Chinese Studies, Criminal Law]

Relation Civil and Military (Hubungan Sipil - Militer Menjelang Pilkada 2019)

Hubungan Sipil and Militer by Pojok 8 Solo (Relation Civil and Military) in Indonesia 3 April 2018

United State Civil Authority has retired the Command in Chief of War Operation

Relation of Leadership Military and Civil Authority in Indonesia has been spoken as the Indonesia President has been opposite to current retired General. According to Pojok 8 Source it is because of the weakness transformation of  civil leadership.  More Retired Indonesia Chief of Command Military has not been transformed for active role in leadership in as non commissioning function towards good of Public Matter after they are expired. As by Indonesia Constitution lack of structure political transformation and business of retired General has led him  to hold position to lead direction of country as Dwi Fungsi ABRI as they are expired from TNI Services.
As Indonesia Constitution state that  Polri and TNI can not be involved with Business and Political activity and tendencies. The Constitution  (UU) No 3 Tahun 2004. In United States Constitution, military leadership is rightfully subordinate to civilian authority. For that reason, the Constitution divides military power between the legislative branch (Congress) and the executive branch (the presidency) — a separation of power intended to avoid abuses of authority. But In Indonesia TNI has been  separated from operation of civil service but with the network of   business elite and political elite.  They are one of the source to influence gain of power. As the transformation of General towards Dwifungsi (two functions)  ABRI has been reflected from the ORBA, as the authority of current government leader at the hand of military leader than the civil authority has been weak in transforming the retired leader of military to lead the current need of public poor service. Indonesia is still in transition whether the retired General would still hold power position towards direction of current authority of government. But the retired General has been prepared  not to enter leadership of public and civil servant in global era and region.  They are not able to transform the leadership for the good of  public services for example leading in rescue operation, humanitarian and safety of public good  in Indonesia and region of South East Asia Nations but they are just busy to seize power and  do not want to subordinate to civil authority of current government.
This disruption phenomena has been identified as Cold Relationship between Civil and Military. Although the retired General has nothing to do with the operating Military in Command  at the current stage. they are assume to hold power as front line to lead in  of  direction of government Indonesia. Pojok 8 has been discussing the forum Relationship but Military Retired should be delegate to role of good of public service as non commissioning instead they are assumed to null of position.

Click to buy this book to earn about Military intervention of Military in Arab Spring countries

Since the Arab Spring, militaries have received renewed attention regarding their intervention into politics of Middle Eastern and South Asian states. This book examines the factors which influence military intervention and withdrawal from politics—namely, United States and Soviet/Russian economic and military aid—and how this affects democratic transitions and consolidation. The militaries of Algeria, Egypt, Pakistan, and Turkey, have used nationalism to justify their interventions into politics while ensuring that withdrawal would only occur if national identity were protected. This book examines important states in the Islamic World which have experienced similar historical trajectories, briefly experimented with democracy, and had the military become a dominant institution in the state. All four countries differ in their levels of ethnic conflict, importance placed on the country by the international community, and internal security concerns. The common result of international influence on political development, however, is that the military will take a keener interest in politics and be more reluctant to disengage.

This new Handbook offers a wide-ranging, internationally focused overview of the field of civil–military relations.

The armed forces are central actors in most societies and are involved in many different roles. Amongst other activities, they engage in peace operations, support the police in fighting crime, support civilian authorities in dealing with natural disasters, and fight against terrorists and in internal conflicts. The existing literature on this subject is limited in its discussion of war-fighting and thus does not do justice to this variety of roles.

The Routledge Handbook of Civil–Military Relations not only fills this important lacuna, but offers an up-to-date comparative analysis which identifies three essential components in civil–military relations: (1) democratic civilian control; (2) operational effectiveness; and (3) the efficiency of the security institutions. Amalgamating ideas from key thinkers in the field, the book is organized into three main parts:

• Part I: Development of the Field of Study;
• Part II: Civil–Military Relations in Non-Democratic or Nominally Democratic Countries;
• Part III: Civil–Military Relations in Democratic and Democratizing States: Issues and Institutions.

This new Handbook will be essential reading for students and practitioners in the fields of civil–military relations, defense studies, war and conflict studies, international security and IR in general.

Conference Civil Military McChain